Wonderbringers Newsletter with Monica Parker
View this email in your browser
Hello Wonderseekers!
I read an article recently entitled "Our brains evolved to survive, not to find truth." In its simplest terms, evolutionarily, we learned to focus on what kept us alive. A twig cracking behind us in the jungle told our brain to flee, whether the threat was real or not. Survival trumped truth. It did then and it still does now.
What this means practically is that we carry a neurological bias towards accepting untruths that feel protective, and a remarkable tolerance for false comforts that make us feel safe. This is compounded by something equally primal — our need to belong. Our beliefs are not merely intellectual positions. They are the social currency through which we form bonds.
Shared beliefs kept early humans alive. Shared beliefs built stronger communities, deeper loyalties and more resilient tribes. It didn't much matter whether those beliefs were true. What mattered was whether they strengthened the social sinews between people. We evolved not truth-optimised, but safety-optimised, belonging-optimised.
From those evolutionary roots, we became meaning-seeking creatures. Viktor Frankl, who survived the Nazi concentration camps, argued that meaning was the single greatest survival mechanism available to human beings. Not comfort. Not even safety. Meaning.
I find myself sitting with all of this as I watch footage of children's coffins in the streets of Iraq. A war waged on a myth by a leader for whom truth has rarely been a constraint. This is not an aberration of human nature. It is an expression of it. Catastrophic collective acts do not require malice in every heart. They require only the right fiction, told in the language of belonging, to a brain already wired to believe what feels safe, and to reject what feels threatening.
And now we are introducing artificial intelligence into this already fragile epistemic ecosystem. We are outsourcing our knowledge-gathering, fact-checking, and the very construct of what is real. If our brains were never optimised for truth, what happens when we delegate even the pretence of truth-seeking to an algorithm? What does that do to our capacity for meaning, and over generations, to the evolution of the human mind itself?
These are not hypothetical questions. Some scientists fear we may have reached our evolutionary apex, and the natural continuation is one of regression, not progression. The answer seems foregone when we look at the rubble in faraway cities, the quiet atrophying of our critical thinking, the acquiescence of our autonomy to technology.
But here is where I find something improbably hopeful. Frankl didn't survive the camps by being optimistic. He survived by being lucid. By interrogating his perceptual, psychological and moral assumptions. By choosing meaning in the most meaning-stripped environment imaginable. That same capacity lives in us. The brain that can be misled or even malicious is also the brain that built Fallingwater, discovered mRNA — and today bears witness to the truth. Awareness of our own cognitive architecture is itself a form of evolution.
Staying lucid requires resolve. A daily practice against the ruts of your well-worn neural pathways. It begins with slowing down before the twig snaps. Recognising that misinformation spreads when it is inflammatory. Pausing before the outrage and asking, is this true or does it merely stir something in me? Lucidity deepens when we detach our identity from our beliefs, finding genuine pleasure in being wrong, treating a changed mind as a sign of intellectual and moral strength.
But perhaps the most profound tool is wonder. Wonder and awe are antidotes to cognitive complacency. They encourage flexibility over dogma. Where fear closes the mind, only allowing in the familiar and safe, wonder pries it open and challenges comfortable falsehoods.
The antidote to a world cosseted in untruths is not more information. It is the rediscovery of genuine astonishment. The willingness to sit with not-knowing long enough for something true to emerge. In a world where leaders wage wars on false pretences and algorithms echo our own beliefs back as fact, wonder is not a luxury. It is a protest. A radical form of survival of a different and more meaningful kind.
Some wonderbringers for me this week:
The political economy of love: Love requires attention, affection, and reciprocal flow. Capitalism can commodify the first two, but the third resists the market, which is why our economic system is so determined to destroy it.
An AI warning: Nobel winner joins ranks of laureates who’ve cautioned about the risks of their own work.
A world of happy progress: 64 reasons for optimism in 2026.
As I mentioned last week, I want Wonderbringers to be worthwhile to all of you who have been so loyal to it week in and week out for the last three years. So… What would be super helpful is if you would take a short survey to help me figure out what’s next!
As an incentive, I will randomly select three participants to receive a free, signed copy of The Power of Wonder. Thank you!
With wonder,
Follow Me
Why am I getting this email?
Good question!
You’re getting this email because you are on HATCH Analytics’s or Monica Parker’s mailing list.
If you don’t want to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe at the bottom.
(We do hope you stick around, though.)
Copyright ©*|CURRENT_YEAR|* Monica C. Parker. All rights reserved.
Want to unsubscribe? That’s ok! We’re sad to see you go, but you’ll still be a part of our Wonderbringer community in spirit.
Mailing address:
10 Colosseum Terrace
London, UK NW1 4EB